<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kindo &#187; Stefano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kindo.com/author/Stefano/feed/en/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kindo.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Hugh John Mungo Grant</title>
		<link>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/12/hugh-john-mungo-grant/en/</link>
		<comments>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/12/hugh-john-mungo-grant/en/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Family trees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindo.com/blog/?p=1576</guid>



		<description><![CDATA[Hugh Grant, actually Hugh John Mungo Grant is an extremely well educated chap. He is also a well-known British actor. British to the root, most would say. Well, do I have news for you!
His roots do not all pass into the soul of Notting Hill or Scotland - it passes deep through our Mother City, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh Grant, actually Hugh John Mungo Grant is an extremely well educated chap. He is also a well-known<img class="alignright" style="border: 1px solid black; float: right;" src="http://www.virginmedia.com/microsites/movies/slideshow/top-ten-almost-bonds/img_3.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /> British actor. British to the root, most would say. Well, do I have news for you!</p>
<p>His roots do not all pass into the soul of Notting Hill or Scotland - it passes deep through our Mother City, Cape Town and not only the British Isles – as one would think. His roots run deep into South Africa, notwithstanding his excellent British education. Major Ronald Grant was born in the Cape and died at his home in Newlands, Cape Town. Whilst his paternal roots run deep into the South African heart, his maternal roots are as Scottish as can be – and she is an aristocrat, without doubt.</p>
<p>“Hugh attended Wetherby School, Latymer Upper School as well as gaining a scholarship at the New College in Oxford where he studied English and was a member of the Piers Gaveston Society, a notorious dining club. Before his finals exams at Oxford, he was set to do a PhD in the History of Art at the Courtauld Institute but could not follow through as he failed to attain a first class degree which he would have required to achieve for his doctoral studies”</p>
<p>Andrew Lloyd Webber’s mother actually gave him piano lessons, so he is musical as well!</p>
<p>Lets forget all the scandal and concentrate on the positive. Apart from his well-publicised film career, where he became famous as a result of Four Weddings and a Funeral, he is an accomplished producer and comedian and good musician.</p>
<p>Scandal seems to have followed him throughout his life and I think he really has the knack to ‘step into it’ – as it were.</p>
<p>Grant is an ‘addictive’ golfer, albeit it very competitive and often extremely unsporting about it, a very good rugby union player who played In his Schools first team and even plays soccer.</p>
<p>You can have a look at Hugh&#8217;s Family Tree <a href="http://kindo.com/en/famous-people/hugh-grant-family-tree/hugh-grant.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/12/hugh-john-mungo-grant/en/feed/en/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Things you probably did not know about South Africa</title>
		<link>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/06/5-things-you-probably-did-not-know-about-south-africa/en/</link>
		<comments>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/06/5-things-you-probably-did-not-know-about-south-africa/en/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindo.com/blog/?p=1698</guid>



		<description><![CDATA[
It is commonly believed that the first person to land in South Africa from Europe was Jan van Riebeeck. Wrong! It was Bartholomew Diaz in 1486 when he landed at Angra Pequena, nowadays called Luderitz Bay and it is in Namibia. In those days Namibia was legally part of the Republic of South Africa and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/af/Flag_of_South_Africa.svg/800px-Flag_of_South_Africa.svg.png" alt="" width="250" height="175" align="right" /></p>
<li>It is commonly believed that the first person to land in South Africa from Europe was Jan van Riebeeck. Wrong! It was Bartholomew Diaz in 1486 when he landed at Angra Pequena, nowadays called Luderitz Bay and it is in Namibia. In those days Namibia was legally part of the Republic of South Africa and it was known as South West Africa. However, the whites were not the first inhabitants of the land. <a href="http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/20/the-need-for-written-records-in-gealogy-the-khoikhoi/en/">The Khoisan people</a> were there before them. They were not the first either – before them were two nations, the Khoi and the San. It is from one of these two races that all mankind is born. South Africa is, therefore the cradle of mankind!</li>
<li>The first church in South Africa was the Dutch Reformed Church because it was the church of the United Netherlands and Jan van Riebeeck was a citizen of the United Netherlands. Wrong! It was the Roman Catholic Church. When Bartholomew Diaz landed here, he stuck the cross of the Catholic Church into South African soil. Jan van Riebeeck did not come on behalf of the United Netherlands – he came on behalf of the Dutch East India Company, a company duly registered in accordance with the laws of the United Netherlands. Indonesia was, in those days a colony of the United Netherlands.</li>
<li>The Afrikaners are the smallest minority group in South Africa and there are many other groups much larger than them. Wrong. There are more Afrikaners than English. Herewith excerpt from the CIA fact sheet reflecting the census results of 2001 and you will note that they are the third largest group in South Africa. “IsiZulu 23.8%, IsiXhosa 17.6%, Afrikaans 13.3%, Sepedi 9.4%, English 8.2%, Setswana 8.2%, Sesotho 7.9%, Xitsonga 4.4%, other 7.2% (2001 census)”</li>
<li>The South African national dish originates from the Afrikaans speaking Boers and consists of barbecued meat and sausage. Wrong, the South African National dish is Bobotie and it originated in Indonesia. It is eaten by almost all groups and few would turn a plate down. Many variations exist on the theme. It consists of minced lamb with various spices, usually a Malay curry spices as well as raisons or almonds covered with a covering of egg custard. A few lemon leaves are inserted and it is baked. Eaten hot or cold, it is delicious.</li>
<li>Apartheid has been part of the South African way of life since the end of the South African War. Wrong. The Afrikaners did not win the war. Lord Kitchener and the British Army won the war - even though most Europeans considered the tactics used irregular. The English and the Afrikaner never really reconciled thereafter. Everyone who spoke Afrikaans was classified Afrikaner, regardless of the race and even then Colour played no part. In 1921 during the Rand Revolt, the Communist party tried to unite the Boers using the following slogan - &#8220;White Workers Unite for a White South Africa&#8221; - the sight of this slogan along with the hammer and sickle flag became the call to all Afrikaners to unite against the gold mines. Notwithstanding this, in 1924 the National Party came into power until 1933, when a coalition government had to be formed since the lost. Only in 1948 when the Afrikaans government won the election, did they brutal racial segregation policies become enforced and Apartheid began.</li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/06/06/5-things-you-probably-did-not-know-about-south-africa/en/feed/en/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mothers Day</title>
		<link>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/05/12/mothers-day/en/</link>
		<comments>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/05/12/mothers-day/en/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindo.com/blog/?p=1550</guid>



		<description><![CDATA[This might be slightly late, however, rather late than never  
Officially it started in the United States, West Virginia to be exact, in 1908. A young lady named Anna Jarvis was the person who got the ball rolling.  Anna’s mother was very active in organizing woman’s groups that promoted friendship within the community, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This might be slightly late, however, rather late than never <img src='http://kindo.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </em></p>
<p>Officially it started in the United States, West Virginia to be exact, in 1908. A young lady named Anna Jarvis was the person who got the ball rolling.  Anna’s mother was very active in organizing woman’s groups that promoted friendship within the community, educated the community and did all she could to encourage the various communities to live together in harmony and peace. One has to bear in mind that this was a post war society – a war where brother fought brother. It was her dream to bring families, that had been divided by the Civil War, together. So, she came up with the idea of Mother’s day and her daughter, in 1908 got the ball rolling.  Exactly one year after her mother had died - the 12th of May 1907.<br />
So that memorial service  to her mother became the first Mother’s day.<img class="alignright" style="float: right;" src="http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/1011/45018312.JPG" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p>In 1914 President Woodrow Wilson declared the second Sunday of May to be the official Mother’s day.</p>
<p>Anna Jarvis wore a white carnation as a tribute to her mother, but the new tradition changed that and a pink carnation was worn to represent a living mother and a white one for a mother that has already passed. Some people still do that. Over the years and over continents grandmothers – and even aunts are included. (In our family, all the mothers are honoured equally). At first the day was a day to honour and show respect for mothers, but this soon turned into a  massive commercialized day and cards and any flowers are now sent, as well as simple and sumptuous gifts. A glorious opportunity for the retailers worldwide.<br />
Ironically Anna Jarvis spent the last years of her life trying to get the day abolished.</p>
<p>In 17th century England people who had moved away from their homes visited their mothers on the fourth Sunday of Lent and became known as “Mothering Sunday” – but celebrated earlier in the year in England. In India they celebrate Durga-puja, when the goddess Durga is honoured – and that is Mother’s day there!!</p>
<p>A post by <a href="http://www.justfoodnow.wordpress.com">Jacoba</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/05/12/mothers-day/en/feed/en/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So you want to do a family tree of your family?</title>
		<link>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/23/so-you-want-to-do-a-family-tree-of-your-family/en/</link>
		<comments>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/23/so-you-want-to-do-a-family-tree-of-your-family/en/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Genealogy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindo.com/blog/?p=1419</guid>



		<description><![CDATA[
In ancient times no such thing existed and since we lived in tiny, closely knitted communities and we believe such information was passed on by word of mouth. Early scrolls provide scant information and as soon as they started showing up, we depended on the census records here. Once we learnt to write, we started [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1421 alignleft" style="float: left;" title="pic-of-a-family-bible" src="http://kindo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/pic-of-a-family-bible-251x300.jpg" alt="" width="251" height="300" /></p>
<p>In ancient times no such thing existed and since we lived in tiny, closely knitted communities and we believe such information was passed on by word of mouth. Early scrolls provide scant information and as soon as they started showing up, we depended on the census records here. Once we learnt to write, we started recording everything!</p>
<p>Information was very difficult to find during the middle ages and it is only quite a while after Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press in 1440 that accurate records start appearing because systems improved and because there were more Bibles printed – even though these were very few and far between. Remember that books were a rarity. The Catholic Church, that ruled Europe at the time with the assistance of the Canon Law, had their hands full with persecutions, stimulation of wars and a fervent need to cleanse everyone and everything. There was little time to educate the masses – much less a need for it and they had no time to have Bibles printed for the people. It must be remembered how prominently the Catholic Church featured in the lives of our ancestors living in Europe.</p>
<p>Now for today and our need to record our own family trees! To start, you will need birth records or death certificates. Usually the latter records the date of birth, the cause, exact date and time of death. However, death certificates may not always have been issued in the more recently developed nations. In Australia, America and South Africa where pioneers were responsible for the birth and development of a modern nation, the Family Bibles are the most important source because very often these were the only records ever kept. Life in a wagon on a wagon trail was hard and once the pioneers arrived at their destinations, they still had to develop communities and only then built towns. The Family Bible was the only viable vehicle in which to record such vital information.</p>
<p>In most families, the family Bibles will contain extremely accurate information of a family tree – as well as information about where that first relative came from – and researching then becomes much easier. In Europe reasonable records were kept, often without the aid of the Family Bible – with the exception of countries where natural disasters occurred, of course – like in Holland where some of my own family records were lost when an entire town was flooded!</p>
<p><img src="http://kindo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/bible-open-pages.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Nowadays we have the web and a massive amount of information can be found online. Online information does save time and endless trips to libraries, archives and government departments but more often than not one will be unable to find the detailed information contained in a Family Bible. There are millions of family Bibles all over the world and numerous American websites devoted entirely to them – but even those cannot function without the Bibles themselves.</p>
<p>Most Family Bibles contain more than one surname because when marriages were recorded, the full names of both bride and groom were entered, thus introducing completely new families to the family tree.  In this way, one finds long forgotten links to maiden names, names of Godparents and all the baptismal records for that family. Here the birth dates will be recorded very accurately. I have even found Bibles where someone recorded the census records – a good tip for trying to locate that elusive relative is to search through census records. But to save yourself a lot of frustration, do try and find your old Family Bibles.<a href="http://kindo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/pic-of-a-family-bible.jpg"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/23/so-you-want-to-do-a-family-tree-of-your-family/en/feed/en/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The need for written records in genealogy - the KhoiKhoi.</title>
		<link>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/20/the-need-for-written-records-in-gealogy-the-khoikhoi/en/</link>
		<comments>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/20/the-need-for-written-records-in-gealogy-the-khoikhoi/en/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefano</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/20/the-need-for-written-records-in-gealogy-the-khoikhoi/</guid>



		<description><![CDATA[It is difficult, even impossible, for someone of Khoisan descent to build a family tree that goes back further than two, maybe three generations.
It is generally believed that the Khoikhoi arrived in the Cape about 2,000 years ago, having migrated South from outside South African borders. A peaceful people they were hunters gatherers.
In order to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is difficult, even impossible, for someone of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khoisan">Khoisan</a> descent to build a family tree that goes back further than two, maybe three generations.</p>
<p>It is generally believed that the Khoikhoi arrived in the Cape about 2,000 years ago, having migrated South from outside South African borders. A peaceful people they were hunters gatherers.<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/32/San_tribesman.jpg/200px-San_tribesman.jpg" align="right" height="299" width="200" /></p>
<p>In order to make any study of genealogy, one would need to have access to records of some kind – written records. Here the problem arises. It was only in the 19th century that two German ethnographers became the first people to write down the Khoisan folklore, belief and customs. All this information was received verbally from a few informants.</p>
<p>Accurate family trees for Kindo members of Khoisan descent may be more difficult to do than for some other cultural groups for the simple reason that there was no written records. The later governments did not provide for this but, largely, the nature of the way of life of this incredible people was such that it was impossible to keep track of who was born and who died and when. It is only in the last few decades that we have systems in place that ensure accurate record keeping and the many prominent leaders and educated citizens will certainly see to it.</p>
<p>So to the Kindo members – persevere and visit that old aunt or grandmother for the true information.</p>
<p>Thank you to Jacoba for her input on this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kindo.com/blog/2008/04/20/the-need-for-written-records-in-gealogy-the-khoikhoi/en/feed/en/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
